Watchly Safety Review

Subscribe To Win MrBeast's Tesla!

Mark Rober

1:00 · 64.4M views · July 13, 2024

All reviews →

Major ConcernsReviewed June 2026

1Major Issue

2Moderate Concerns

4Minor Flags

This video documents a creator's participation in a MrBeast challenge and subsequent attempt to win Tesla vehicles through basketball shots and robot engineering. While the content itself is clean and showcases problem-solving, it heavily relies on giveaway mechanics and subscribe-to-win tactics that may pressure children into engagement behaviors.

Content Breakdown · 7 Categories

Hidden Advertising & Sponsored ContentA little

While the video transparently features MrBeast and Tesla products, there's no explicit disclosure about whether this is sponsored content. However, the context suggests it may be organic participation in a MrBeast video rather than paid promotion. The score is low due to ambiguity.

See evidence (1)

“References to MrBeast's video and Tesla Cybertrucks without clear sponsorship disclosure”Throughout

Materialism & Wealth FlexingSome

The video centers around high-value luxury items (Tesla Cybertrucks worth approximately $60k-$100k each) as prizes. Multiple Teslas are casually referenced ('I convinced MrBeast to send me two more Teslas'), which normalizes extreme wealth and luxury items. However, the framing is around giveaways rather than personal flexing.

See evidence (4)

“This is me about to win a Tesla cyber truck from MrBeast”0:00-0:10

“MrBeast tempted us with 10 cyber trucks”0:20-0:30

“I convinced MrBeast to send me two more Teslas”1:00-1:10

“So as a bit of redemption if my robot makes the shot, this Tesla is Matthews”

Parasocial & Emotional ManipulationA little

Mild parasocial elements present. The creator references 'Matthew' as their 'super fan' and creates a personal narrative around redemption. However, this is relatively mild and not overtly manipulative compared to more extreme examples.

See evidence (2)

“every creator had one super fan waiting outside”0:30-0:40

“So as a bit of redemption if my robot makes the shot, this Tesla is Matthews”1:10-1:20

Toxic Behavior ModelingA little

Minor concern: The creator voluntarily chose to leave a $1 million challenge, which could be interpreted as impulsive decision-making. However, this was framed as a positive choice to help their fan, so the toxic modeling is minimal.

See evidence (1)

“But if I miss he gets nothing and I'm kicked out and that was an easy choice. Jimmy! Peace!”0:40-0:50

Algorithm-Bait & Disguised ContentA little

The title 'Subscribe To Win MrBeast's Tesla!' uses MrBeast's name for clickability, though the content does deliver on the promise. There's no mismatch between thumbnail promise and content, but the title is optimized for algorithm performance.

See evidence (1)

“Title: Subscribe To Win MrBeast's Tesla!”Title

Engagement Baiting & Manipulative CTAsA lot

Strong engagement baiting present. The video explicitly ties a Tesla giveaway to subscribing, using high-value prizes to coerce subscriptions. The CTA directly conditions prize eligibility on subscription action, which is a classic manipulative engagement tactic.

See evidence (3)

“So hit the subscribe button now and I'll see you soon”1:20-1:30

“Well, that's going to a random subscriber who gets the same deal as him”1:15-1:20

“Title: Subscribe To Win MrBeast's Tesla!”

Low-Quality, Extreme & Stunt ContentSome

Moderate presence of stunt-style content. The video participates in MrBeast's signature high-stakes challenge format ('last to leave wins $1 million') and involves multiple expensive vehicles as props. However, it's not extreme eating or destruction content.

See evidence (3)

“the last creator to leave the box would win $1 million”0:10-0:20

“MrBeast tempted us with 10 cyber trucks”0:20-0:30

“I convinced MrBeast to send me two more Teslas”1:00-1:10

What Parents Need to Know

This video is primarily a promotional piece built around giveaway culture and subscription baiting. The creator explicitly tells viewers to subscribe for a chance to win a Tesla, which teaches children that engagement actions lead to material rewards. The content features significant wealth displays (multiple Tesla vehicles) and models a transactional relationship between creators and viewers. While there's no inappropriate language or unsafe content, the video's core purpose is audience growth through prize incentives rather than educational or entertainment value. Children may not understand the extremely low odds of winning such giveaways or recognize the manipulative marketing tactics at play.

Talk to Your Kids About

1Why do you think YouTubers give away expensive prizes like cars? What are they hoping viewers will do?
2If someone asks you to subscribe or like their video to enter a contest, what are the chances you'll actually win? How does that make you feel?
3What's the difference between watching a video because you enjoy it versus watching because someone promised you a prize?
4Can you think of other ways creators could make interesting content without asking viewers to subscribe for giveaways?

Protected Viewing

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this video appropriate for young children?

While the content contains no inappropriate language or unsafe material, it's built entirely around giveaway mechanics and subscription manipulation. Young children may not understand they're being marketed to or recognize the extremely low probability of winning such contests, making it more suitable for older kids who can think critically about influencer tactics.

Will my child actually win a Tesla if they subscribe?

The odds of winning are astronomically low, likely one in hundreds of thousands or millions of subscribers. These giveaways are marketing strategies designed to grow channel audiences, not genuine opportunities for viewers. It's important to help children understand that subscription-based contests are essentially lottery systems with minimal chance of winning.

What is my child learning from this type of content?

This video primarily teaches that engagement actions (subscribing, liking) lead to material rewards, which establishes transactional relationships with content creators. While there's a brief element of engineering problem-solving with the robot, the core message is about wealth display and giveaway culture rather than educational content or genuine entertainment value.

Why do videos like this ask viewers to subscribe?

Creators use giveaways to rapidly grow their subscriber base, which increases their channel's visibility, advertising revenue, and sponsorship opportunities. The cost of one or two prizes is far outweighed by the financial benefits of gaining thousands or millions of new subscribers. Understanding this helps children recognize they're participating in a business transaction, not receiving a gift.

Is there anything educational about this video?

There's a minor element of robotics and engineering when the creator mentions building a robot to make basketball shots. However, this is presented as a brief aside rather than explored in depth, and the primary focus remains on the giveaway mechanics and wealth display rather than STEM learning.

Should I be concerned about the materialism in this video?

The video centers entirely on expensive vehicles (Tesla Cybertrucks) as prizes and status symbols, which may contribute to materialistic values in young viewers. It's worth discussing with children that happiness and success aren't measured by expensive possessions, and that content focused primarily on wealth display often lacks substance.

What age is "Subscribe To Win MrBeast's Tesla!" appropriate for?

Watchly's safety review recommends "Subscribe To Win MrBeast's Tesla!" for ages 10 and up. See the content breakdown above for the category-by-category findings behind this recommendation.