Watchly Safety Review

I Bought An Expensive Car Using Only $1 Bills

MrBeast
10:29 · 37.8M views · February 13, 2018
All reviews →
Major ConcernsReviewed June 2026
1Major Issue
3Moderate Concerns
2Minor Flags

This video is generally safe for older kids but heavily promotes materialism and wealth flexing, as the creator buys a car with $1 bills to surprise his brother. The positive side includes a genuine act of generosity and family bonding, but the constant focus on money, views, and merchandise detracts from the altruistic message. Parents should note the lack of educational value and the manipulative engagement tactics used throughout.

Content Breakdown · 6 Categories

Hidden Advertising & Sponsored ContentA little

The video contains multiple undisclosed or minimally disclosed promotional elements: a 'New Merch Store' link, a Viewstats link, and a direct pitch to buy merch ('if you want to allow me to do more nice things for people by the merch'). The creator also says 'no sponsors' but then immediately promotes merch, which could be seen as a hidden ad for his own line. Additionally, he plugs a specific car dealership ('East Carolina dodge in Greenville') without clear disclosure that this is a paid or promotional mention.

See evidence (3)
no sponsors so if you want to allow me to do more nice things for people by the merch it looks pretty good
if you guys buy a car you have to buy from this place East Carolina dodge in Greenville you have to buy it from here
Bombers because watch you guys my merch I'll have more money to do nice things like this so link will be in description just by submerge and yeah we can surprise more people at things
Materialism & Wealth FlexingSome

The entire premise of the video is a wealth flex: buying an expensive car with $1 bills, tipping $1,000, and surprising a brother with a car. The creator frames this as 'nice things' but the core content is a display of financial power. The tarp trick to make the money pile look bigger also suggests a focus on the visual spectacle of wealth. The phrase 'this is perfect for my publicity' further indicates the flex is intentional.

See evidence (4)
we're gonna be buying a car using only $1 bills and then surprising my brother with the car
I'm gonna go in here and I'm gonna give their accountant a thousand dollar tip
we had to put a tarp under it so it looked fuller because we didn't have that many $1 bills full disclosure there is a tarp under here but this is still 17,500 $1 bills
this is perfect for my publicity
Parasocial & Emotional ManipulationSome

The creator uses multiple parasocial manipulation tactics: guilt-tripping viewers to buy merch ('if you want to allow me to do more nice things for people by the merch'), coercing engagement ('if the video doesn't get a lot of use though I might have to return'), and framing the car giveaway as dependent on viewer behavior ('give us a speed bike to make my brother this opportunity'). The line 'remember guys always stop plugging to let people do fictions' is confusing but may be a manipulative call for engagement.

See evidence (4)
no sponsors so if you want to allow me to do more nice things for people by the merch it looks pretty good
if the video doesn't get a lot of use though I might have to return
give us a speed bike to make my brother this opportunity
remember guys always stop plugging to let people do fictions
Toxic Behavior ModelingA little

The video models several potentially toxic behaviors: lying to a car dealership ('I need a lot of $1 bills for a funeral'), using a tarp to deceive viewers about the amount of money, and framing the entire stunt as a prank on the dealership staff. The creator also jokes about returning the car if the video doesn't get enough views, which models transactional relationships and emotional manipulation.

See evidence (3)
Hey so I need a lot of $1 bills for a funeral and so I was just wondering could I exchange $1,000 for ones
we had to put a tarp under it so it looked fuller because we didn't have that many $1 bills full disclosure there is a tarp under here but this is still 17,500 $1 bills
if the video doesn't get a lot of use though I might have to return
Engagement Baiting & Manipulative CTAsA lot

The video is heavily loaded with engagement-baiting and manipulative calls-to-action. The creator uses guilt-tripping ('if you want to allow me to do more nice things for people by the merch'), conditional threats ('if the video doesn't get a lot of use though I might have to return'), and exclusion language ('you guys should join her and subscribe'). He also runs a contest with a vague prize ('if you want a $100 get first comment on any of my videos I do a gift card') and asks viewers to comment on how long Chris should wait to have a kid, which is a manipulative engagement tactic.

See evidence (4)
if the video doesn't get a lot of use though I might have to return
you guys should join her and subscribe
all right comments section let me say this Chris can't have a kid for at least like three years right please yeah preferably five please everyone comment how long he has to wait to have a kid and that have Katie read the comment section
if you want a $100 get first comment on any of my videos I do a gift card and make sure you follow me on Instagram
Low-Quality, Extreme & Stunt ContentSome

The video is a classic example of stunt-driven content: buying a car with $1 bills, tipping $1,000, and using a tarp to make the money pile look bigger. The premise is designed for shock value and spectacle rather than informational or educational value. The creator also mentions 'extreme-eating challenges' and 'endurance gimmicks' in the category description, but the transcript itself shows the stunt is the core content.

See evidence (3)
we're gonna be buying a car using only $1 bills
I'm gonna go in here and I'm gonna give their accountant a thousand dollar tip
we had to put a tarp under it so it looked fuller because we didn't have that many $1 bills full disclosure there is a tarp under here but this is still 17,500 $1 bills

What Parents Need to Know

This video centers on a YouTuber buying a car with $1 bills as a surprise for his brother, which can teach kids about generosity and family relationships. However, it heavily emphasizes wealth, spending large sums of money, and promoting merchandise for personal gain. There are also manipulative elements like asking viewers to comment on when a friend should have a child and encouraging subscriptions for giveaways. The content is not educational and may encourage materialistic values in younger viewers.

Talk to Your Kids About

  1. 1What do you think about the way the YouTuber surprised his brother with the car? Was it more about being kind or showing off?
  2. 2Why do you think the creator asked viewers to comment on when his friend should have a child? How does that make you feel?
  3. 3How would you feel if someone gave you an expensive gift but then talked a lot about how much money they spent?
  4. 4What are some ways to show kindness to family members that don't involve spending a lot of money?
I Bought An Expensive Car Using Only $1 Bills
Protected Viewing

What's This Video About?

I CAN'T BELIEVE IT WORKED! NEW Merch Store! - https://mrbeast.store Check out Viewstats! - https://www.viewstats.com/ SUBSCRIBE FOR A FREE CAR ---------------------------------------------------------------- ► FOLLOW BOTH THESE AND I WILL HAVE YOUR KIDS! • Twitter - https://twitter.com/MrBeastYT • Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/mrbeastyt/ --------------------------------------------------------------------

Frequently Asked Questions

What age is this video appropriate for?

We recommend age 10 and up. The video has no explicit content but promotes materialism and wealth flexing, which younger children may not critically understand. Older kids can better grasp the difference between generosity and showing off.

Is there any inappropriate language or behavior in this video?

No, there is no strong language, violence, or sexual content. However, the creator uses manipulative tactics like asking viewers to comment on personal matters (e.g., when a friend should have a child) and constantly promotes his merchandise, which may model unhealthy online behavior.

Does this video have any educational value?

The video has minimal educational value. It primarily focuses on a surprise gift and the process of buying a car with dollar bills, but does not teach any academic or life skills. The main takeaway is about generosity, but it's overshadowed by materialism and self-promotion.

Are there any hidden advertisements or sponsored content?

The video does not have traditional sponsored segments, but the creator heavily promotes his own merchandise throughout, asking viewers to buy it so he can do more 'nice things.' This is a form of self-promotion that parents should be aware of.

Could this video encourage materialistic values in children?

Yes, the video repeatedly emphasizes the cost of the car ($17,500 in $1 bills) and the creator's wealth. It frames expensive gifts as the ultimate way to show love, which may lead children to equate generosity with spending large amounts of money.

Is the surprise element in the video genuine or staged?

The surprise appears genuine, as the brother seems unaware and grateful. However, the video is edited for entertainment, and some moments (like the dealership call) may be exaggerated. Overall, the core act of giving is real, but the presentation is dramatized for views.

More from MrBeast

See all →
Subscribe for $10,0000:14
Subscribe for $10,000
113.7M views·Jun 5, 2026
Major issues
7 Days Stranded in The Arctic32:15
7 Days Stranded in The Arctic
72.5M views·May 30, 2026
Major issues
I Surprised a Random Subscriber With $10,0000:36
I Surprised a Random Subscriber With $10,000
171.6M views·May 29, 2026
Major issues
Subscribe To See 500M Play Button0:33
Subscribe To See 500M Play Button
209.8M views·May 22, 2026
Minor flags

What Watchly checks every video for

Every video is checked against Watchly's 21 content patterns. Here are a few of them.

© 2026 Watchly. All rights reserved.
Not affiliated with YouTube or Google. All creator content remains property of original creators.