Watchly Safety Review

Last To Leave Slime Pit Wins $20,000 - Challenge

MrBeast

17:50 · 152.5M views · November 30, 2018

All reviews →

Some ConcernsReviewed June 2026

2Moderate Concerns

7Minor Flags

This challenge video is safe for most kids aged 10 and up, aside from mild crude humor and a strong focus on winning a large cash prize. The video positively showcases perseverance and lighthearted competition, but parents should be aware of the materialistic themes and some mild language. Overall, it's an entertaining but not educational video that may spark discussions about money and sportsmanship.

Content Breakdown · 9 Categories

Playful & Fantasy ViolenceA little

A single playful 'Kame-hame-ha' reference is made, but no actual violence or combat occurs; it is purely a pop-culture joke.

See evidence (1)

“Kame-hame-ha!”

Strong & Crude LanguageA little

Mild crude language and bathroom humor are present, including references to testicles, peeing, and pooping, but no strong profanity or slurs are used.

See evidence (4)

“My vehicles, which is what I call my testicles, are being squeezed right now by the water.”

“I have peed twice now.”

“I pooped my pants.”

“Rub your poop on him.”

Sexual References & Suggestive ContentA little

A mild sexual reference is made when a participant refers to his testicles as 'my vehicles,' but no explicit sexual content or innuendo beyond this is present.

See evidence (1)

“My vehicles, which is what I call my testicles, are being squeezed right now by the water.”

Substance Use & Sports BettingA little

A participant asks to smoke a cigarette, and the host mentions breaking a nicotine addiction, but the overall message is anti-smoking ('do not smoke'). No gambling or sports betting is present.

See evidence (2)

“Chandler's dad asked if he could smoke a cigarette. No. We're gonna break your nicotine addiction with this challenge.”

“Guys and girls, do not smoke. Do not smoke. It will stunt your growth, you'll be that tall.”

Materialism & Wealth FlexingSome

The video centers on a $20,000 prize and repeatedly discusses buying luxury items (BMW), framing wealth as a goal, but it is presented as a challenge reward rather than casual flexing.

See evidence (2)

“What would you buy with the 20 grand? I think I'd upgrade the Beamer. Or just get another one. Be a double Beamer boy.”

“I was gonna buy another Beamer.”

Parasocial & Emotional ManipulationA little

Mild emotional manipulation is used to pressure participants, such as referencing viewer expectations to keep them in the challenge, but it is not extreme or guilt-tripping.

See evidence (2)

“The viewers want you to win. Are you gonna let them down?”

“Think of all the viewers that will be mad if you get out.”

Toxic Behavior ModelingA little

A brief suggestion to 'rub your poop on him' is crude but not seriously harmful; no harmful pranks, animal mistreatment, or glorified theft occur.

See evidence (1)

“Rub your poop on him.”

Engagement Baiting & Manipulative CTAsA little

The video includes a playful threat ('SUBSCRIBE OR I TAKE YOUR DOG') and a reference to viewer disappointment, but these are mild and not coercive.

See evidence (2)

“SUBSCRIBE OR I TAKE YOUR DOG”

“Think of all the viewers that will be mad if you get out.”

Low-Quality, Extreme & Stunt ContentSome

The video is a classic endurance stunt (last to leave slime pit) with extreme discomfort (cold, blue lips, inability to feel legs), fitting the 'stunt-driven content' category.

See evidence (3)

“I can't feel my legs.”

“Your lips are turning blue, boy.”

“I'm freezing.”

What Parents Need to Know

This video is a competitive challenge where five young men stay in a slime pit for up to 10 hours to win $20,000. It includes mild crude humor (references to peeing and pooping), some mild language (e.g., 'hell'), and a strong emphasis on winning money. The video does not contain violence, bullying, or dangerous challenges, but the competitive pressure and physical discomfort (e.g., hypothermia, numbness) may be intense for younger viewers. On the positive side, the video showcases perseverance, teamwork (e.g., alliances), and lighthearted banter. Parents should be aware that the participants discuss buying cars and other material items with the prize money, which may reinforce materialistic values. The video also includes a brief anti-smoking message. Overall, it is a relatively safe but not educational video for older children.

Talk to Your Kids About

1What did you think about the challenge? Would you have stayed in the slime pit for $20,000? Why or why not?
2The participants talked about buying cars and other things with the money. What would you do with $20,000? Is winning money the most important thing?
3Chandler's dad joined the challenge to beat his son. How do you think they felt competing against each other? What does it mean to be a good sport?
4The video had some jokes about peeing and pooping. Why do you think those jokes are funny? Are there times when those jokes might not be appropriate?

Last To Leave Slime Pit Wins $20,000 - Challenge

Protected Viewing

What's This Video About?

LAST ONE TO GET OUT OF THE SLIME PIT WINS $20,000!! New Merch - https://mrbeast.store Check out Viewstats! - https://www.viewstats.com/ SUBSCRIBE OR I TAKE YOUR DOG For any questions or inquiries regarding this video please reach out to chucky@mrbeastbusiness.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- ► FOLLOW BOTH THESE AND I WILL HAVE YOUR KIDS! • Twitter - https://twitter.com/MrBeastYT • Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/mrbeast --------------------------------------------------------------------

Frequently Asked Questions

What age is this video appropriate for?

This video is recommended for ages 10 and up. The content involves a physical challenge in a slime pit with mild crude humor (references to peeing and pooping), some mild language, and a strong focus on winning a large cash prize. Younger children may find the competitive pressure and physical discomfort themes confusing or distressing.

What is the content of this video?

The video features a group of young men competing in a slime pit for a $20,000 prize. It includes mild crude humor (references to peeing and pooping), some mild language, and a strong emphasis on winning money. There is no violence or sexual content, but the competitive pressure and physical discomfort may be intense for younger viewers.

Is this video safe for my child to watch?

The video has a moderate risk of modeling materialism and wealth flexing, as the prize is a large sum of money and participants discuss buying cars. There is also some mild crude humor and language. However, there is no violence, bullying, or dangerous challenges. The overall tone is playful and competitive.

Does this video promote materialism?

The video has a moderate focus on materialism, with participants discussing buying cars and other items with the prize money. This could reinforce the idea that winning money is the ultimate goal. Parents may want to discuss the value of money and the importance of non-material achievements.

Are there any inappropriate jokes or language in this video?

The video includes mild crude humor, such as references to peeing and pooping in the slime pit. There is also some mild language (e.g., 'hell'). These elements are not extreme but may be inappropriate for younger children. Parents should consider their child's sensitivity to such humor.

What is the educational value of this video?

The video is a challenge video where participants compete to be the last one in a slime pit. It is not educational but can be entertaining for children who enjoy competitive challenges. The video does not teach any specific skills or knowledge, but it may spark discussions about perseverance, competition, and teamwork.