Watchly Safety Review

I Survived 100 Days on ONE BLOCK in Minecraft

aCookieGod

44:46 · 28.4M views · February 1, 2021

All reviews →

Major ConcernsReviewed June 2026

1Major Issue

6Minor Flags

1No Issues

This episode is safe for most kids apart from some mild crude humor and scary monster encounters woven into the gameplay. The video is highly educational, teaching problem-solving, resource management, and planning through a creative Minecraft challenge. While the player's jokes about bodily functions and light insults may not be ideal for younger viewers, the overall content is positive and engaging for children aged 8 and up.

Content Breakdown · 8 Categories

Strong & Crude LanguageA little

Very mild crude language and bathroom humor appears in a few places, but no strong profanity or slurs are present. The language is generally clean and suitable for a broad audience.

See evidence (3)

“"Get your ass in the house" (directed at a pig in jest)”Day 1 (approx. early portion)

“"like what happens after you eat some taco bell — it just doesn't go down the hole man" (toilet humor about spiders clogging a mob farm)”Day 39-40 (approx. mid portion)

“"my personal plunger was not happy" (referencing bathroom after Taco Bell)”Day 40 (approx. mid portion)

Sexual References & Suggestive ContentA little

Very mild double entendres and innuendo appear briefly, but nothing explicit or intended to sexualize young viewers. References are fleeting and within a joking/non-sexual context.

See evidence (4)

“"I forced my cows to make some love" (breeding animals in Minecraft)”Day 12 (approx.)

“"Maybe they had a fetish or something" (joking about spiders clustering in a corner)”Day 39 (approx.)

“"Watching these two lovebirds fall in love in the sunset" / "Watch them make love — violate their privacy — villagers don't have rights" (joking about villager breeding)”Day 57 (approx.)

Materialism & Wealth FlexingNot present

Very mild wealth-flexing appears in a brief joke about having 'unlimited supply of boots' and wearing a different pair each day of the week, presented as a Minecraft joke rather than serious materialism. No real-world luxury goods or designer hauls.

See evidence (1)

“"Now I don't need to wear my 40 pairs of iron boots — I just got a different shoe every other day… rich people" (joking about in-game boot collection)”Day 72-73 (approx.)

Gambling Mechanics in GamesA little

Minor randomized loot mechanics appear in the form of opening in-game chests from the one-block mining, but these are standard Minecraft gameplay mechanics, not casino-style gambling or monetized loot boxes. The creator does not spend real money or treat them as gambling.

See evidence (2)

“Opening chests that randomly spawn (standard Minecraft feature)”Throughout entire video (standard gameplay)

“Trading with villagers for random enchanted items (standard gameplay)”

Parasocial & Emotional ManipulationA little

Moderate use of engagement-bait language designed to build emotional dependence, especially in the outro. The creator frames the relationship with subscribers as personal, using phrases like 'please subscribe because I've been working really hard' and 'share to all your friends.' While common in YouTube, these are flagged for awareness.

See evidence (3)

“"Please please subscribe because I've been working really hard on these videos"”Intro (approx. start)

“"Like if you haven't already" (end of video)”Day 101 outro (approx. end)

“"Comment down below if you want day 200"”

Toxic Behavior ModelingA little

Mild toxic behavior is modeled in a few aspects: the creator repeatedly talks about 'abusing' villager trades and 'sacrificing' villagers by punching them off cliffs, and there is an incident of pushing a pig into water to drown it (in jest). However, all of this is within the context of Minecraft gameplay and is framed humorously, not as real-world advice. The creator also shows rare moments of sadness when his virtual parrot dies. Overall, the tone is playful, not malicious.

See evidence (4)

“"I decided to try to drown him" (pig, in jest)”Day 1 (approx. early)

“"I sacrificed my fletchers because their trades were actually garbage" — then punches villager off a cliff into the void”Day 70 (approx. late)

“"Very long day of abusing the villagers' trades"”Day 69-70 (approx.)

Engagement Baiting & Manipulative CTAsA little

Moderate engagement baiting is present, particularly in the intro and outro. The creator uses emotional pressure ('please subscribe because I've been working really hard') and conditional calls to action ('like if you want day 200'). No superstition-based CTAs or fake giveaways appear.

See evidence (2)

“"If you're new here please please subscribe because I've been working really hard on these videos and like bruh we could do better than this guys come on"”Intro (approx. start)

“"Comment down below if you want day 200 — like the video if you haven't already"”Outro (approx. end)

Playful & Fantasy ViolenceA lot

Heavy presence of fantasy violence, but entirely within the context of Minecraft gameplay. The creator fights Minecraft mobs (zombies, skeletons, creepers, spiders, phantoms, blazes, etc.) using swords, bows, and tridents. All violence is stylized, consequence-free, and within the game's mechanics. The creator also engages in 'cruel' acts like pushing animals into water or off cliffs, but these are presented humorously and within the game's fantastical setting.

See evidence (5)

“Fighting zombies, skeletons, spiders, creepers, witches, phantoms, blazes, hoglins, etc. throughout the video”Day 6 (zombies)

“Pushing a pig into water to drown it (jest)”Day 7 (creeper, spiders)

“Killing foxes and wolves for various reasons”Day 12 (skeletons)

What Parents Need to Know

This video is a creative and engaging Minecraft challenge that teaches problem-solving, resource management, and planning. The player builds a base, farms, trades with villagers, and progresses through phases to eventually fight the Ender Dragon. However, parents should be aware of mild crude humor (e.g., jokes about bathroom breaks and 'taco bell'), light insults (e.g., calling a villager 'unibrow looking'), and some scary moments with monsters (e.g., surprise attacks from witches and blazes). There is also mild violence, such as killing animals for food and fighting mobs, but it is cartoonish and within the context of the game. The video does not contain realistic violence, sexual content, or dangerous challenges. Overall, it is a positive and educational experience for children who enjoy Minecraft.

Talk to Your Kids About

1What was the most creative solution the player used to solve a problem in the video?
2How did the player handle the monster parties and scary moments? What would you do differently?
3Why do you think the player made jokes about his girlfriend and the villagers? Was that kind or funny?
4If you were playing this challenge, what would you build first and why?

What's This Video About?

I Survived 100 Days on ONE BLOCK in Minecraft 🔥 1000 DAYS ONE BLOCK PLAYLIST: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqyCqmSEa8cTrXd32gcUEg-kNgtIc0Ufg 🐤 » Twitter: https://twitter.com/aCookieGod ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 》"100 Days" Inspired by @LukeTheNotable 》"One Block Skyblock" Inspired by @WadZee @Aphmau @UnspeakableReacts_ 》"OneBlock" Map Download by @IJAMinecraft https://ijaminecraft.com/map/oneblock/ #minecraft #oneblock #100days

Frequently Asked Questions

What age is this video appropriate for?

This video is appropriate for children aged 8 and up. The content is largely creative and educational, focusing on problem-solving and resource management in Minecraft. However, there is mild crude humor, some scary moments with monsters, and a few instances of mild violence (e.g., killing animals, fighting mobs) that may be too intense for younger viewers.

Does this video contain any inappropriate language or humor?

The video contains mild crude humor, such as jokes about bodily functions (e.g., 'taco bell' and bathroom breaks) and light insults (e.g., calling a villager 'unibrow looking'). There are also some scary moments with monsters and mild violence, like killing animals and fighting mobs, but no realistic violence or gore.

Is this video educational for kids?

Yes, the video has strong educational value. It teaches problem-solving, planning, and resource management as the player builds a base, farms, trades with villagers, and progresses through phases. It also introduces concepts like automation (item sorters, cobblestone generators) and strategic thinking.

Are there any violent or scary scenes in this video?

The video includes mild violence, such as killing animals (pigs, cows, chickens) for food and fighting monsters (zombies, skeletons, witches). There are also some scary moments, like surprise attacks from mobs and the player dying. However, the violence is cartoonish and within the context of Minecraft gameplay, with no realistic gore or blood.

Does the video contain any sexual or suggestive content?

The video has a few instances of mild crude humor, such as jokes about bathroom breaks and 'taco bell,' as well as light insults (e.g., calling a villager 'unibrow looking'). There is also a brief joke about a 'girlfriend' that may be slightly suggestive but is overall harmless. No sexual content or references are present.

Is this video safe for my child to watch?

The video is safe for children aged 8 and up. It is a creative and engaging Minecraft challenge that promotes problem-solving and patience. However, parents should be aware of mild crude humor, some scary monster encounters, and a few instances of mild violence (e.g., killing animals). The video does not contain realistic violence, sexual content, or dangerous challenges.