We witnessed Duolingo getting hit by a CYBERTRUCK #RIPDuolingoBird

The mention of 'Cybertruck' is a brand name, but in context it appears to be part of a comedic skit referencing a viral internet moment rather than a product promotion or undisclosed sponsorship.

While a character being hit by a vehicle could theoretically model harmful behavior, the context of a cartoon mascot in a clearly comedic skit (tagged as 'skit') does not constitute meaningful toxic behavior modeling.

The video uses a recognizable brand mascot (Duolingo bird) and a trending viral moment (#RIPDuolingoBird) which are attention-grabbing, but this aligns with the actual content described and does not appear to disguise inappropriate material beneath kid-friendly branding.

The video references a mascot being hit by a vehicle as a comedic stunt, but given it is tagged as a 'skit' involving a cartoon character, it does not rise to the level of extreme or shock-value stunt content targeting young viewers.

The core premise — the Duolingo cartoon owl mascot being hit by a Cybertruck — constitutes playful/fantasy violence involving a non-human mascot character in a comedic skit context. This is stylized and consequence-free in tone (the hashtag '#RIPDuolingoBird' is used humorously as part of a viral internet trend).

The transcript describes a character (the Duolingo bird mascot) being hit by a vehicle (Cybertruck), which references a physical impact/collision. However, this appears to be a comedic skit involving a cartoon mascot rather than realistic violence against a real person.