Analyse de sécurité Watchly

I don’t need one more subscriber

Mark Rober

0:48 · 83,3 M de vues · 23 avril 2024

Toutes les analyses →

Major ConcernsReviewed June 2026

3Major Issues

2Moderate Concerns

1Minor Flag

This video shows a creator dangling from a rope 12 stories high as a stunt to gain subscribers, explicitly using dangerous behavior as engagement bait. While the creator jokingly reverses course at the end, the core content glorifies risky stunts for social media attention and models extremely poor decision-making.

Content Breakdown · 6 Categories

Strong & Crude LanguageA little

Mild exclamation 'Oh gosh' is present, which is a euphemistic expression. No strong profanity, slurs, or crude language detected.

See evidence (1)

“Oh gosh!”Early in video when rope situation occurs

Realistic Violence, Threats & WeaponsSome

The creator is positioned on a rope 12 stories high with a real fall risk being presented. While framed as a stunt, the physical danger appears real and could be imitable. The explosion reference at 40 million subscribers also suggests potentially dangerous stunts. This is borderline between stunt content and realistic threat of harm.

See evidence (3)

“this rope is the only thing protecting me from a 12 story drop”Throughout - rope danger is central premise

“Did that just fall?”Mid-video - 40 million celebration explosion

“There it is. (explosion)”

Parasocial & Emotional ManipulationSome

The content creates artificial urgency and emotional stakes around subscriber counts, tying the creator's physical safety to viewer actions. The dramatic countdown and 'changed my mind' reversal could create guilt or confusion in young viewers about their role in the creator's wellbeing.

See evidence (4)

“There's only 100 left”Throughout - countdown creates urgency

“50 left!”End - reversal creates confusion

“Oh, there's three more subscribers! Two! One!”

“Actually I've change my mind. Guys, let's just scrap this. Don't subscribe. Please. Don't subscribe.”

Engagement Baiting & Manipulative CTAsA lot

The entire video is structured around manipulative engagement baiting. The creator ties a dangerous physical stunt to subscriber counts, creating artificial urgency and emotional pressure. The dramatic countdown and then reversal ('Don't subscribe. Please.') is a classic manipulation tactic to drive engagement through reverse psychology. This directly exploits viewer emotions for metrics.

See evidence (5)

“I'm about to hit 50 million subscribers! There's only 100 left.”Entire video - stunt tied to subscriber count

“this rope is the only thing protecting me from a 12 story drop”End - reverse psychology CTA

“50 left!”

“Oh, there's three more subscribers! Two! One!”

Dangerous Internet ChallengesA lot

The content depicts a physically dangerous stunt (hanging from rope 12 stories up) tied to social media metrics. This models risky behavior for views and could inspire imitation. The reference to a previous explosion stunt at 40 million subscribers establishes a pattern of escalating dangerous stunts for subscriber milestones. This is highly imitable and dangerous.

See evidence (3)

“this rope is the only thing protecting me from a 12 story drop”Throughout - rope stunt

“Did that just fall?”Mid-video - reference to previous explosion stunt

“for proof, this is what I did at 40 million. 40 million. There it is. (explosion)”

Low-Quality, Extreme & Stunt ContentA lot

This is quintessential extreme stunt content designed purely for shock value and views. The creator performs a dangerous high-altitude stunt tied to subscriber milestones, references a previous explosion stunt, and creates artificial drama around the subscriber count. This is low-quality engagement farming through dangerous stunts rather than substantive content.

See evidence (4)

“I'm about to hit 50 million subscribers!”Entire video - stunt-driven content

“this rope is the only thing protecting me from a 12 story drop”Mid-video - explosion reference

“this is what I did at 40 million. 40 million. There it is. (explosion)”

“I can't see anything!”

What Parents Need to Know

This video features a dangerous stunt where the creator hangs from a rope at a significant height, using the threat of danger to pressure viewers into subscribing. The content scores extremely high for low-quality stunt content, engagement baiting, and dangerous challenges. While no one appears to get hurt, it normalizes using life-threatening situations for online attention and explicitly ties subscriber counts to dangerous behavior. The creator references a previous explosive stunt at 40 million subscribers, suggesting a pattern of escalating dangerous content. Even though he says 'don't subscribe' at the end, the entire premise teaches children that risking your safety is an acceptable way to gain followers.

Talk to Your Kids About

1Why do you think some creators do dangerous things in their videos? Is getting subscribers worth risking your safety?
2If one of your friends said they wanted to try something dangerous to get more likes or followers, what would you say to them?
3What are some creative ways people can make interesting videos without putting themselves or others in danger?
4How can you tell the difference between content that's meant to entertain safely versus content that's trying to manipulate you into subscribing or liking?

Questions fréquentes

Is this video safe for my child to watch?

This video is not recommended for younger children as it glorifies dangerous stunts for social media attention. The creator explicitly dangles from a rope at a dangerous height to pressure viewers into subscribing, which models extremely poor judgment and risk-taking behavior that children might imitate.

Will my child try to copy this stunt?

There is a real risk that children, especially those under 13, may not fully understand the dangers and could attempt similar attention-seeking stunts. The video directly links dangerous behavior to social media success, which is a harmful message for impressionable viewers.

What age is appropriate for this type of content?

This content is only appropriate for teens 13 and older who can critically evaluate the manipulative tactics being used. Even then, parents should discuss why using danger for engagement is problematic and how social media can pressure people into poor decisions.

Does this video teach anything educational?

No, this video has no educational value. It's purely designed to manipulate viewers into subscribing through artificial urgency and dangerous stunts, which are tactics parents should help children recognize and reject.

Why does the creator say 'don't subscribe' at the end?

The reversal at the end appears to be part of the manipulation tactic—creating a false sense that the creator doesn't care about subscribers while the entire video was designed to pressure viewers into subscribing. This kind of reverse psychology is still a form of engagement baiting.

Should I be concerned about other videos from this creator?

Yes, the creator mentions doing an explosive stunt at 40 million subscribers, suggesting a pattern of escalating dangerous content. Parents should preview other videos from this creator and discuss with their children why chasing viral fame through dangerous stunts is harmful.

Non affilié à YouTube ni à Google. Tout le contenu demeure la propriété de ses créateurs d’origine.

“Actually I've change my mind. Guys, let's just scrap this. Don't subscribe. Please. Don't subscribe.”

I don’t need one more subscriber

Content Breakdown · 6 Categories

What Parents Need to Know

Talk to Your Kids About

Questions fréquentes

More from Mark Rober

Ce que Watchly vérifie dans chaque vidéo

Comment Watchly rend YouTube sécuritaire